|

James
E. Hook
NESPAL programs must be built upon a solid foundation of discovery
and technology enhancement. Agriculture water use for irrigation
is predicated upon alleviating yield reducing water stress in crops
using economically sound water application technologies. Irrigation
in the humid areas like the Southeast US was once thought to be
a means to make up for the deficit rainfall during drought seasons
to protect normal yields. Labor limitation imposed by portable pipe
and towable traveler systems and water supplies limited to on-farm
ponds effectively established that notion, one that still persists
outside of the farm community.
Introduction of deep wells that could extract copious supplies from
the abundant Floridan Aquifer and labor saving center pivots altered
that picture forever. The high costs associated with these effective
and efficient irrigation systems required a return on investment
that was greater than yields protected while making normal dryland
yields of corn, soybean, cotton, and even peanut. However, the modern
systems of the 1970's also offered opportunities to greatly increase
yields to the crop potential and opened new market possibilities
like vegetables.
While most of the U.S. continues to convert to center pivots for
substantial improvements in irrigation, Georgia farmers have begun
to realize that even these systems are not as cost effective and
water efficient as they need to be to remain competitive with more
limited water supplies. Back-to-back drought have taxed even the
best systems. Irregular field shapes meant that many center pivot
systems had to be inefficiently small, operated in partial circle,
or fields modified to include unsuitable soils to make complete
circles. The earliest systems were equipped with energy wasting
high pressure pumps and sprinklers that spread water widely, much
of it lost to wind drift and evaporation.
In response to these problems NESPAL, and CAES departments established
field and laboratory-based research projects to improve application
technologies and irrigated crop management:
- Crop Response
to Water - Cost effective irrigation begins with an understanding
of the impacts of various water stress intervals and timing on
yield and quality. While the costs of inputs including irrigation
equipment, well drilling, capital financing, as well as energy,
land rent and, in some cases, water, vary over time and commodity
prices fluctuate, a single "best" irrigation schedule or recommendation
cannot be made. However, by creating a relationship between crop
growth and yield with available water and climate, we can make
recommendations as prices change. Those relationships defining
crop response to water are best encoded in multivariate models
such as those in DSSAT. Studies that have been conducted in the
past have been compiled and data made available via the NESPAL
Irrigation web site for researchers around the globe to develop
and test the models.
With new facilities coming on line in Georgia, new crop response
studies will be initiated, including water relations and quality
for a number of important vegetables. The emphasis in these studies
is a comprehensive examination of crop response to water that
can guide future irrigation decisions by farmers and future water
resource management decisions by permitting agencies.
Throughout these studies, education of farmer and non-farm water
regulators as to crop water needs and efficiencies in land, labor,
and agrichemical inputs achieved with irrigation.
- Irrigation
Scheduling Technology and Management - When water costs less than
labor required to monitor crop water needs, farmers tend to simply
guess water needs. With low value crops they will tend to err
on the short water side and yields can suffer. When crops are
valuable like vegetables, irrigators tend to err by overwatering,
not taking any chances on a water stressed crop. The low cost
of fuel combined with the "unlimited" amounts of water that can
be withdrawn in Georgia meant that it was more cost effective
for farmers to guess than measure water needs.
While the future of irrigation water supply and water markets
are uncertain, limitations already imposed on new water withdrawals
for mst of the irrigated regions in Georgia now place a premium
on effective use of what is withdrawn. Likely increases in energy
costs and mandated limits on water withdrawals may quickly send
farmers looking for cost effective and water saving irrigation
schedules.
Where close attention is needed, monitoring crop, soil, and/or
weather will become necessary. The research efforts of NESPAL
are to develop and evaluate new technologies to remotely monitoring
these parameters. Coupled with crop response models, they will
be used to provide cost-effective, practical irrigation scheduling
that will improve efficiency of crop water use.
- Technologies
for Efficient Application of Water - This Southeast project led
by Biological and Agricultural Engineering focuses efforts of
engineering, agronomy, and new technologies on evaluation of most
effective systems to deliver water to crops. It ties aerial/GIS
assessment and farm surveys that identify existing systems and
problems with efforts to evaluate efficient application alternatives
to existing irrigation systems. Best Management Practices (BMP's)
and costs for implementing them in Georgia were estimated by a
panel of scientists and engineers. That state of the art information
was assembled in web form on our irrigation pages. New thrusts
in this arena will begin in 2002 with completion of new irrigation
research facilities at C.M. Stripling Irrigation Research Park,
Camilla, Ga., and Lang Farm, Tifton, Ga., and be coordinated with
other studies by ARS in Shellman, Ga, and by Auburn, in Headland,
Al. With more than 10,000 center pivots in place, the most effective
strategy is to identify cost-effective, water saving modifications
for existing pivots. Other alternatives will also be examined
under a range of conditions, including traveler systems, soild
set, drip, and subsurface drip (SDI).
- Precision
Irrigation Technologies
|